Welcome to Euthanasia Clinic
A Person Should be Able to Choose the Time, Place, and Manner of Their Own Death.
I'm For Euthanasia. I Support Your Right to Choose.
Use these links to navigate around this web site
A Euthanasia Clinic would provide a place where a Compassionate Law could be implemented allowing people to choose the time, place, and manner of their own death while in the company and companionship of their friends, family, and loved ones.
What's wrong with that?
Here Are a Few Thoughts on Euthanasia
I do not have all the answers, but the answers I do have err on the side of compassion and dignity
God created man so man's life is sacred
There are two separate responses to this that I know of:
1. It should go without saying, but this would only apply if a person believed in God.
I could tell you that Sam the dog had told me that eating chocolate was bad for my health. In order for you to use that claim of information to help you decide whether I were telling you the truth, you would first have to believe that Sam the dog could talk and had some knowledge of my health and the effects of chocolate on it.
Some people might find it difficult to entrust their end of life choices to talking dogs acting as health practitioners. They may feel the same about God.
And if they don't believe in God they will not be swayed by an argument put forward in His name.
2. According to the Christian religion:
God gave man the ability to choose. That was one of the first and most important abilities. Choosing the time, place, and manner of one's own death is in accordance with that free will, and therefore in accordance with God's will.
But if you choose to believe that this particular choice is somehow excluded from God's will, then don't do it. Deny yourself the God given choice of a peaceful and painless death.
Suicide is murder of one's self
If that is what you think or believe and it troubles you, then you shouldn't do it. Otherwise, what harm is done and who is the victim?
Murder is wrong and war is beyond evil. Each requires that a person take the life of another, without their consent.
Yet each is condoned while voluntary Euthanasia is condemned.
Death is too important a decision for an individual to make
It is my life and I am the one who is responsible for my decisions. Those decisions should be based on reason, not fear.
Death will either be Natural or Enabled.
A Natural death is most likely to have pain and suffering.
An Enabled death can achieve a peaceful and painless death every time.
To prefer pain and suffering is not a rational choice.
It is sane and rational to prefer an Enabled death, which offers a peaceful and painless death every time, over a Natural death which is fraught with the perils of uncertainty.
Life is precious and should be prolonged
Imagine that you somehow stumbled into a mine field and stepped onto a mine.
It will not explode if you do not lift your foot. At this point you have absolute control of your life.
Move and you will die. Do nothing and you will live. Until you die.
For some, life is like standing on a land mine.
The delaying of the inevitable may not appeal to them and should not be forced onto them.
At some point the quality of life may become more important than the quantity of it.
The Slippery Slope
"... If we ever decide that a poor quality of life justifies ending that
life, we have taken a step down a slippery slope that places all of us in
danger..."
--
C. Everett Koop,
M.D.
The slippery slope we are on is one of repression and intolerance. We have been on it for a very long time.
When you die you will have made one of two choices about your manner of death.
You will either have chosen to accept whatever came along or you took measures to end it yourself.
You had either a Natural or an Enabled death.
Making your own decisions is what life is all about.
It is not for us to decide for some future generation what choices they should be allowed to make.
Let those who follow us make their own decisions based on their own experiences. Don't burden them with our guilt..
When Euthanasia is accepted, the old, sick, poor, etc will be encouraged to die
It is equally possible that they may be encouraged to live, given the ease with which they could choose a peaceful and painless death.
Those who oppose Euthanasia imagine scenarios such as; 'Granma, you've lived a long time. Shouldn't you think about us now?', or the anguished late night thoughts, 'How will I pay these hospice bills? They just keep piling up.'
There is another side to this.
An acceptance of voluntary Euthanasia would allow compassion to rule over cash. 'Granma, stop. You don't need to lose hope. Tomorrow is another day. If things aren't better, then you can decide. We'll support you. What ever you decide. We love you, and we'll be here with you at the end'.
and
. . . if a person's loved ones were encouraging them to die, then death might seem a preference to them over the life they are living.
With modern health care management it is not necessary for anyone to suffer intolerable or overwhelming pain during their terminal stages of life.
That is not true.
While end of life palliative care is getting better and is to be applauded for it's ability to help some people have a pain free end of life experience, it does not work for everyone.
The ability to choose your own time, place, and manner of death is the only absolutely effective way to avoid unnecessary, debilitating, and degrading pain.
Some people will not benefit from hospice care, and most can not afford it or have access to it.
What about the pain and suffering of those who will be left behind?
They will be left behind regardless.
Better to be open and honest with them and explain your reasons for choosing to take control of your own end of life experience.
Better yet if there were to be Euthanasia Clinics so that they could be with you at the end.
Guilt free. Fault free.
Suicide is a cowardly act.
Those who would pass this judgment on you would rather obligate their friends, family, loved ones, co-workers, neighbors, and countless unknown others to the likelihood of a prolonged and painful death in order to perpetuate their own fear and denial of death as an absolute.
They are cowards. Unable to face the reality of their own death and placing the burden of their denial onto you.
We will all die. A natural death is most likely to be long term, costly, painful, and undignified.
A peaceful and painless death is preferable to that.
To examine your life and choose how you would like it to end is reasonable, rational, and brave.
As more and more people get older, and as they are denied dignified alternative options, many will insist on using all available means to stay alive. Or perhaps they will make no decisions about their own end of life experience and allow attending physicians to make those decisions for them. As a result, more and more people will be sustained on life support mechanisms and decisions will have to be made, without their input or consent, regarding 'pulling the plug'.
While for some this will result in the elimination of life sustaining oxygen, without replacing it with inert Helium or Nitrogen to dispel the build up of anxiety causing Carbon Dioxide, for others it will mean forced starvation over several weeks with attentive palliative care to ensure life is sustained for as long as possible.
These are not desirable end of life experiences. They actually sound like torture. Yet they are condoned while Euthanasia is condemned.
Society will argue endlessly over each case while loved ones are left to suffer and pay for the legal and medical bills.
A Compassionate Law and a Euthanasia Clinic could help make those end of life decisions easier by allowing people to choose the time, place, and manner of their own peaceful and painless death.
A Compassionate Law
Those about whom we care the most may be subject to legal prosecution if they choose to be with us when we need them most.
A dying person does not need the additional worry that their manner of death might cause felony charges to be brought against their loved ones.
A Compassionate Law would make it possible for a person to be in close physical contact with the dying at the time of death and not be subject to legal prosecution afterwards.
A Euthanasia Clinic
would be a place which would be morally defensible, legally acceptable, and compatible with a Compassionate Law.
A p
lace where people could be together at the time of death and know that they would absolutely not be subject to criminal prosecution afterwards.A Euthanasia Clinic would provide a place where a Compassionate Law could be implemented.
Here is an image from a referenced web site.
Here is an image from the video, Soylent Green, showing a Euthanasia Clinic of the future.
The first shows a man contemplating the means of his own death, alone. The other shows a man receiving tender care from compassionate individuals at the time of his death. The first may die alone, while the other will never feel abandoned.
Compassionate care and a Euthanasia Clinic.
Use these links to navigate around this web site